1953 Allard K3 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (165 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3.
Because 2012 Chevrolet Captiva is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Allard K3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Captiva (230 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard K3. (217 Nm). This means 2012 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard K3.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2012 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Allard | Chevrolet |
Model | K3 | Captiva |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3622 cc | 2384 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 165 HP |
Torque | 217 Nm | 230 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4673 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2707 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 38 L | 65 L |