1953 Allard K3 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 44 more horse power than 1953 Allard K3. (94 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard K3.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Allard K3 (217 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 1953 Allard K3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Allard K3 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Allard | Holden |
| Model | K3 | Cruze |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3622 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 94 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 217 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2685 mm |
