1953 Allard K3 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2013 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Allard | Cadillac |
Model | K3 | CTS-V |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4373 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 548 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4877 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1884 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2880 mm |