1953 Allard K3 vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard K3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard K3 would be higher. At 4,373 cc (8 cylinders), 1953 Allard K3 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Allard K3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard K3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Mazda CX-5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Allard K3 | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Allard | Mazda |
Model | K3 | CX-5 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4373 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |