1953 Allard Palm Beach vs. 2001 Toyota Celica

To start off, 2001 Toyota Celica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Allard Palm Beach. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Allard Palm Beach would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Celica (190 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 1953 Allard Palm Beach. (47 HP @ 4400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica should accelerate faster than 1953 Allard Palm Beach. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Celica weights approximately 279 kg more than 1953 Allard Palm Beach. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1953 Allard Palm Beach is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Allard Palm Beach. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Celica (180 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Allard Palm Beach. (101 Nm). This means 2001 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Allard Palm Beach.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Allard Palm Beach 2001 Toyota Celica
Make Allard Toyota
Model Palm Beach Celica
Year Released 1953 2001
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1508 cc 1797 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 47 HP 190 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 101 Nm 180 Nm
Engine Bore Size 79.5 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76.2 mm 85.1 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 6.8:1 11.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 840 kg 1119 kg
Vehicle Length 3970 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1510 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1320 mm
Wheelbase Size 2440 mm 2510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 38 L 45 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]