1953 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2008 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alvis TB 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (176 HP @ 2000 RPM) has 84 more horse power than 1953 Alvis TB 21. (92 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1953 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Range Rover (390 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 186 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alvis TB 21 | 2008 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Alvis | Land Rover |
Model | TB 21 | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 2926 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 176 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 390 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 18.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 2200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2890 mm |