1953 Alvis TB 21 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 60 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alvis TB 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alvis TB 21 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 1953 Alvis TB 21. (92 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1953 Alvis TB 21.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 169 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Alvis TB 21. (204 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Alvis TB 21.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alvis TB 21 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Alvis | Cadillac |
Model | TB 21 | CTS |
Year Released | 1953 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 204 Nm | 373 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.1:1 | 11.3 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1882 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2880 mm |