1953 Alvis TC 21 vs. 1966 Riley Kestrel
To start off, 1966 Riley Kestrel is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alvis TC 21. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alvis TC 21 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Alvis TC 21 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Alvis TC 21 (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Alvis TC 21 should accelerate faster than 1966 Riley Kestrel. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Alvis TC 21 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1966 Riley Kestrel. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Alvis TC 21 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Alvis TC 21. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Riley Kestrel, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Alvis TC 21 (221 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 138 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Riley Kestrel. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1953 Alvis TC 21 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Riley Kestrel.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alvis TC 21 | 1966 Riley Kestrel | |
Make | Alvis | Riley |
Model | TC 21 | Kestrel |
Year Released | 1953 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 885 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 25 L |