1953 Alvis TC vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Alvis TC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Alvis TC would be higher. At 4,009 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (211 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1953 Alvis TC. (100 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1953 Alvis TC. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Mustang weights approximately 85 kg more than 1953 Alvis TC. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Mustang (310 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Alvis TC. (221 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Alvis TC.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Alvis TC | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Alvis | Ford |
Model | TC | Mustang |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4009 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4630 mm | 4770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 60 L |