1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil

To start off, 1965 DAF Daffodil is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,435 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (125 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire weights approximately 915 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 1965 DAF Daffodil
Make Armstrong Siddeley DAF
Model Sapphire Daffodil
Year Released 1953 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3435 cc 746 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 2 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 125 HP 26 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 660 kg
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 3620 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1450 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2060 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 72 L 33 L