1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire vs. 1999 Chevrolet Tracker

To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire would be higher. At 3,435 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (125 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire (239 Nm @ 1000 RPM) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Armstrong Siddeley Sapphire 1999 Chevrolet Tracker
Make Armstrong Siddeley Chevrolet
Model Sapphire Tracker
Year Released 1953 1999
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3435 cc 1590 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 125 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 239 Nm 139 Nm
Torque RPM 1000 RPM 4000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4910 mm 4140 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1690 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2210 mm