1953 Aston Martin DB3 vs. 2006 Mazda 3
To start off, 2006 Mazda 3 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Aston Martin DB3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Aston Martin DB3 would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Aston Martin DB3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Aston Martin DB3 (153 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 3. (150 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Aston Martin DB3 should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 3.
Because 1953 Aston Martin DB3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Aston Martin DB3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Aston Martin DB3 (195 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 3. (183 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1953 Aston Martin DB3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 3.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Aston Martin DB3 | 2006 Mazda 3 | |
Make | Aston Martin | Mazda |
Model | DB3 | 3 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2922 cc | 1999 cc |
Horse Power | 153 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 195 Nm | 183 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1050 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2220 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 55 L |