1953 Austin A 110 vs. 2000 BMW 328
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 BMW 328 (192 HP @ 7400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 BMW 328 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 110. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 110 weights approximately 387 kg more than 2000 BMW 328.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin A 110 (287 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 1953 Austin A 110 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 110 | 2000 BMW 328 | |
Make | Austin | BMW |
Model | A 110 | 328 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 287 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1588 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4880 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 63 L |