1953 Austin A 110 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 110 weights approximately 377 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Triax.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 110. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1953 Austin A 110 has manual transmission. 1953 Austin A 110 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 110 | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 110 | Triax |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3992 cc | 660 cc |
Horse Power | 124 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2790 mm |