1953 Austin A 110 vs. 2010 Mazda 3

To start off, 2010 Mazda 3 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 110. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 110 would be higher. At 3,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 3500 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 110. (124 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 110.

Because 1953 Austin A 110 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 110. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 3 (360 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 110. (287 Nm). This means 2010 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 110.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Austin A 110 2010 Mazda 3
Make Austin Mazda
Model A 110 3
Year Released 1953 2010
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3992 cc 2184 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 124 HP 148 HP
Engine RPM 3800 RPM 3500 RPM
Torque 287 Nm 360 Nm
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Length 4880 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1755 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1471 mm
Wheelbase Size 3040 mm 2639 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 55 L