1953 Austin A 135 vs. 2000 Jaguar XKA
To start off, 2000 Jaguar XKA is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 135. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 135 would be higher. At 4,399 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar XKA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar XKA (466 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 348 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 135. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar XKA should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 135. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 135 weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Jaguar XKA.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Jaguar XKA (843 Nm) has 592 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 135. (251 Nm). This means 2000 Jaguar XKA will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 135.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 135 | 2000 Jaguar XKA | |
Make | Austin | Jaguar |
Model | A 135 | XKA |
Year Released | 1953 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3993 cc | 4399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 466 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 843 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1800 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3360 mm | 2590 mm |