1953 Austin A 30 vs. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair
To start off, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 2,368 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Chevrolet Corvair is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair (81 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Chevrolet Corvair should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1960 Chevrolet Corvair weights approximately 490 kg more than 1953 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 30 | 1960 Chevrolet Corvair | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 30 | Corvair |
Year Released | 1953 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 2368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 81 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |