1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans

To start off, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Cadillac Le Mans is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (600 HP) has 572 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 30. (28 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans weights approximately 1115 kg more than 1953 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Cadillac Le Mans (400 Nm) has 346 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 2002 Cadillac Le Mans will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 30. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans has automatic transmission and 1953 Austin A 30 has manual transmission. 1953 Austin A 30 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Cadillac Le Mans will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Austin A 30 2002 Cadillac Le Mans
Make Austin Cadillac
Model A 30 Le Mans
Year Released 1953 2002
Engine Position Front Middle
Engine Size 802 cc 4000 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 28 HP 600 HP
Torque 54 Nm 400 Nm
Engine Bore Size 58 mm 93 mm
Engine Stroke Size 76 mm 73.4 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 1 seats
Vehicle Weight 680 kg 1795 kg
Vehicle Length 3470 mm 4660 mm
Vehicle Width 1410 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1490 mm 1030 mm
Wheelbase Size 2030 mm 2830 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]