1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2002 Honda Integra
To start off, 2002 Honda Integra is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Honda Integra is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 30 | 2002 Honda Integra | |
Make | Austin | Honda |
Model | A 30 | Integra |
Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4374 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1725 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2350 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |