1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 620 kg more than 1953 Austin A 30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 30 | 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 30 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1953 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 2491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 165 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 221 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 61 L |