1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2006 Ford F-250
To start off, 2006 Ford F-250 is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 4,198 cc, 2006 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford F-250 (177 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 149 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 30. (28 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 30.
Because 2006 Ford F-250 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford F-250 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford F-250 (500 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 446 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 30. (54 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 30 | 2006 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | A 30 | F-250 |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 802 cc | 4198 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 28 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 54 Nm | 500 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 103 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 17.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 6250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 2060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 3970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 114 L |