1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2008 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 2,499 cc, 2008 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 1298 kg more than 1953 Austin A 30.
Because 2008 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 30. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Cherokee (343 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 30. (54 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2008 Jeep Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 30 | 2008 Jeep Cherokee | |
| Make | Austin | Jeep |
| Model | A 30 | Cherokee |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 802 cc | 2499 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 343 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 58 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.2:1 | 17.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 680 kg | 1978 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1850 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 70 L |
