1953 Austin A 30 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 30. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 30 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Nissan Micra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 51 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 30. (28 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 30.
Because 1953 Austin A 30 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 30. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Nissan Micra (108 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 30. (54 Nm). This means 2011 Nissan Micra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 30.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 30 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 30 | Micra |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 802 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 28 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 54 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3470 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1410 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2030 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 46 L |
