1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1959 Lotus Seven
To start off, 1959 Lotus Seven is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin A 40 (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Lotus Seven. (36 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin A 40 should accelerate faster than 1959 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 40 weights approximately 550 kg more than 1959 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1959 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Austin | Lotus |
Model | A 40 | Seven |
Year Released | 1953 | 1959 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2240 mm |