1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 1964 Nissan Bluebird is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Nissan Bluebird (47 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Bluebird should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 40 weights approximately 66 kg more than 1964 Nissan Bluebird.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Nissan Bluebird (88 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1964 Nissan Bluebird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1964 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Austin | Nissan |
Model | A 40 | Bluebird |
Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1189 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 88 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2390 mm |