1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1964 Plymouth Valiant
To start off, 1964 Plymouth Valiant is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,789 cc (6 cylinders), 1964 Plymouth Valiant is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1964 Plymouth Valiant (100 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1964 Plymouth Valiant should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1964 Plymouth Valiant | |
Make | Austin | Plymouth |
Model | A 40 | Valiant |
Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |