1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite
To start off, 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite weights approximately 190 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1966 Austin-Healey Sprite | |
Make | Austin | Austin-Healey |
Model | A 40 | Sprite |
Year Released | 1953 | 1966 |
Body Type | Convertible | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1180 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1350 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2040 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 27 L |