1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1966 Chevrolet Corvette
To start off, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,999 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Chevrolet Corvette is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette (425 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 384 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Chevrolet Corvette should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Chevrolet Corvette weights approximately 431 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 40 | 1966 Chevrolet Corvette | |
| Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
| Model | A 40 | Corvette |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1966 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1463 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1280 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 76 L |
