1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado
To start off, 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 6,967 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1953 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1967 Oldsmobile Toronado | |
Make | Austin | Oldsmobile |
Model | A 40 | Toronado |
Year Released | 1953 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 6967 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3030 mm |