1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne
To start off, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,097 cc (6 cylinders), 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (110 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne (251 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 167 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1972 Chevrolet Biscayne | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Biscayne |
Year Released | 1953 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4097 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 251 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5590 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 3090 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 87 L |