1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1982 Buick Skyhawk
To start off, 1982 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 54 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1953 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1982 Buick Skyhawk | |
Make | Austin | Buick |
Model | A 40 | Skyhawk |
Year Released | 1953 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1086 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2580 mm |