1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,589 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (49 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 240 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1995 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 56 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (83 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 1995 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 40 | Tracker |
Year Released | 1953 | 1995 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 97 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 139 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 990 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2210 mm |