1953 Austin A 40 vs. 1999 Nissan C 52
To start off, 1999 Nissan C 52 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 3,496 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan C 52 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan C 52 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan C 52 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Nissan C 52 weights approximately 234 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan C 52 (354 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (84 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan C 52 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 40 | 1999 Nissan C 52 | |
| Make | Austin | Nissan |
| Model | A 40 | C 52 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 3496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 152 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 354 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 1 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1266 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2830 mm |
