1953 Austin A 40 vs. 2002 Mahindra Bolero
To start off, 2002 Mahindra Bolero is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Mahindra Bolero is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (72 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mahindra Bolero weights approximately 663 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Mahindra Bolero is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mahindra Bolero will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Mahindra Bolero (155 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2002 Mahindra Bolero will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 40 | 2002 Mahindra Bolero | |
| Make | Austin | Mahindra |
| Model | A 40 | Bolero |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 41 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 84 Nm | 155 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1695 kg |
