1953 Austin A 40 vs. 2006 Panoz Esperante
To start off, 2006 Panoz Esperante is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 4,589 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Panoz Esperante is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Panoz Esperante (305 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Panoz Esperante should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Panoz Esperante (434 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 350 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2006 Panoz Esperante will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 2006 Panoz Esperante | |
Make | Austin | Panoz |
Model | A 40 | Esperante |
Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 4589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4300 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 84 Nm | 434 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 59 L |