1953 Austin A 40 vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet HHR is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40.

Because 1953 Austin A 40 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 40. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin A 40. (84 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin A 40.

Compare all specifications:

1953 Austin A 40 2009 Chevrolet HHR
Make Austin Chevrolet
Model A 40 HHR
Year Released 1953 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1200 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 41 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 4300 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 84 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 2200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4060 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1610 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1630 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2360 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 61 L