1953 Austin A 40 vs. 2010 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Swift is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Swift is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2010 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 2010 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Austin | Suzuki |
Model | A 40 | Swift |
Year Released | 1953 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1695 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2430 mm |