1953 Austin A 40 vs. 2012 Renault Koleos
To start off, 2012 Renault Koleos is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,488 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Renault Koleos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Koleos (169 HP) has 128 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 40. (41 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Koleos weights approximately 618 kg more than 1953 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Renault Koleos is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 40. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Renault Koleos will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 40 | 2012 Renault Koleos | |
Make | Austin | Renault |
Model | A 40 | Koleos |
Year Released | 1953 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1200 cc | 2488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 41 HP | 169 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1032 kg | 1650 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1610 mm | 1855 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1695 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2360 mm | 2690 mm |