1953 Austin A 70 vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1960 Toyota Master RR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin A 70 (66 HP) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin A 70 should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 70 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 70 | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Austin | Toyota |
| Model | A 70 | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2199 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 56 L | 75 L |
