1953 Austin A 70 vs. 1972 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt (72 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 70 weights approximately 360 kg more than 1972 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 1953 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Mitsubishi Colt, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 70 | 1972 Mitsubishi Colt | |
| Make | Austin | Mitsubishi |
| Model | A 70 | Colt |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1972 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1498 cc |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2360 mm |
