1953 Austin A 70 vs. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 5,665 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 280 kg more than 1953 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 70 | 1999 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | A 70 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1953 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 5665 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 68 L |