1953 Austin A 70 vs. 2005 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP) has 127 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 70. (63 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 275 kg more than 1953 Austin A 70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 70 | 2005 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 70 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 190 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |