1953 Austin A 70 vs. 2005 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2005 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 2,200 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 70 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volkswagen Polo (83 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 70 weights approximately 325 kg more than 2005 Volkswagen Polo.
Because 1953 Austin A 70 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 70. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Volkswagen Polo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 70 | 2005 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Austin | Volkswagen |
Model | A 70 | Polo |
Year Released | 1953 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 1423 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 77.4 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 945 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 45 L |