1953 Austin A 70 vs. 2006 Cadillac STS-V
To start off, 2006 Cadillac STS-V is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 4,376 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac STS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac STS-V (440 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 377 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 70. (63 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac STS-V should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 70.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2006 Cadillac STS-V has automatic transmission and 1953 Austin A 70 has manual transmission. 1953 Austin A 70 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac STS-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin A 70 | 2006 Cadillac STS-V | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | A 70 | STS-V |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2200 cc | 4376 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 63 HP | 440 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4990 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2960 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 64 L |
