1953 Austin A 70 vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 70. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 70 would be higher. At 3,960 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 300 kg more than 1953 Austin A 70.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1953 Austin A 70. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1953 Austin A 70 | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Austin | Jeep |
Model | A 70 | Wrangler |
Year Released | 1953 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2200 cc | 3960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 63 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 79.4 mm | 98.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 111.1 mm | 86.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1270 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4150 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 72 L |