1953 Austin A 90 vs. 2001 Honda Fuya Jo

To start off, 2001 Honda Fuya Jo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,658 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Honda Fuya Jo (127 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1953 Austin A 90. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fuya Jo should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin A 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin A 90 weights approximately 550 kg more than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo.

Because 1953 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Honda Fuya Jo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin A 90 (190 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. (149 Nm). This means 1953 Austin A 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Honda Fuya Jo. 2001 Honda Fuya Jo has automatic transmission and 1953 Austin A 90 has manual transmission. 1953 Austin A 90 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Honda Fuya Jo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: