1953 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1964 Seat 1500
To start off, 1964 Seat 1500 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey 100 (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1964 Seat 1500. (71 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey 100 should accelerate faster than 1964 Seat 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Seat 1500 weights approximately 212 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey 100.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey 100 | 1964 Seat 1500 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Seat |
| Model | 100 | 1500 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 1481 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 71 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 948 kg | 1160 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4470 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |
