1953 Austin-Healey 100 vs. 1995 Seat Toledo
To start off, 1995 Seat Toledo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey 100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey 100 would be higher. At 2,660 cc (4 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey 100 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Seat Toledo weights approximately 107 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey 100.
Because 1953 Austin-Healey 100 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Austin-Healey 100. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Seat Toledo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Seat Toledo (205 Nm) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Austin-Healey 100. (144 Nm). This means 1995 Seat Toledo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Austin-Healey 100.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey 100 | 1995 Seat Toledo | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Seat |
| Model | 100 | Toledo |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2660 cc | 2324 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 144 Nm | 205 Nm |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 215 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 948 kg | 1055 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2480 mm |
