1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 1966 Ford GT 40 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible weights approximately 316 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Ford |
| Model | Sports Convertible | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1953 | 1966 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1136 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1040 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2420 mm |
