1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (105 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. (94 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible should accelerate faster than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart weights approximately 23 kg more than 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible.
Let's talk about torque, 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible (190 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart. (185 Nm). This means 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 1953 Austin-Healey Sports Convertible | 2001 Mercedes-Benz Smart | |
| Make | Austin-Healey | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Sports Convertible | Smart |
| Year Released | 1953 | 2001 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1689 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 105 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 185 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1452 kg | 1475 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3230 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2720 mm |
